Monthly Archives: April 2012

And the winner is…

Good morning!

I’ve used random.org, which has picked a winner of the signed copy of Weird Things Customers Say in Bookshopsand it’s number 13. Well done

Ann Salisbury!

Ann, I’ve emailed you and the book should be winging its way over the Atlantic very soon (such a good image…)

Thanks for all the entries, some of them were hilarious, and definitely worthy of inclusion in a volume 2! Even if you didn’t win, you should still think about buying a copy of Jen’s book – it’s been in the Sunday Times best-seller list for the last two weeks, so let’s see if we can keep it there for a bit longer.



Tom-All-Alone’s by Lynn Shepherd

I’m the first to admit that, despite having both an undergraduate and postgraduate degree in English Literature, I’m not the biggest reader of ‘classics’. I can count the number of Shakespeare’s plays that I’d like to read/see again on the fingers of one hand, can’t get past the third chapter of any Thomas Hardy novel and have only finished 2 of Charles Dickens’ tomes (and one of those was Hard Times, which doesn’t even count as a tome…). So when I was sent a review copy of Lynn Shepherd’s Tom-All-Alone’s, I was a little worried. Inspired by Dickens’ Bleak House, and running along side it, in terms of plot, Shepherd’s novel is a look at the seedy underbelly of Victorian London. Combining her own interpretations of characters from Bleak House and A Woman in White, as well as her own creations, Shepherd has managed to breathe new life into the sometimes tired genre of Victoriana.

Shepherd’s protagonist is Charles Maddox, a young man attempting to forge a career as a private detective, having been unfairly dismissed from the Metropolitan Police after an altercation with the infamous Inspector Bucket. His great-uncle, also called Charles Maddox, is the famous thief-taker from Shepherd’s first novel, Murder at Mansfield Park. The two are close, and when the elder Maddox starts suffering from a mysterious ailment resulting in periods of memory loss and violent behaviour, Charles moves from the lodgings that he shared only with his cat into his uncle’s house. From a modern perspective, it is clear that these episodes are symptomatic of dementia, or Alzheimer’s, but Shepherd has cleverly left it unnamed. The puzzlement and fear that Charles and his great-uncle’s servants feel when confronted with the disease echoes Maddox’s confusion, making this aspect of the story even more poignant.

Aside from the familial situation, Charles’ life is further complicated by the case that he is asked to look into, by the sinister solicitor Tulkinghorn. Engaged to discover the author of some anonymous letters, Charles is convinced that there is more to the case than meets the eye, a view that is confirmed when he meets intense, and violent, opposition to his investigations. Determined to discover what Tulkinghorn and his cronies are hiding, he delves deeper, resulting in his own life and those of his loved ones being threatened. There are some gory sections, including one particularly nasty scene which made me reach for something to hide behind.  Shepherd doesn’t pull any punches when it comes to representing the grim reality of aspects of Victorian London that Dickens, in view of the sensibilities of his readers, could only hint at.

Charles’ sections of the novel have an omniscient narrator who invites the reader to accompany him as he watches Charles and his investigations. Running alongside this narrative is that of Hester, an inhabitant of The Solitary House. She has been taken there by a mysterious ‘guardian’, and is one of a number of girls who live there. She speaks with great affection for her guardian, and for Mr. Jarvis, the man in charge. As her narrative begins, it is easy to think that she is just naive (for example, her descriptions of her mother’s frequent male ‘callers’ leave the reader in no doubt as to her profession, but her daughter is unaware), but it quickly becomes more sinister. It is hard to see how Hester and Mr. Jarvis fit with Charles’ story, but both tales are skilfully, and movingly, brought together at the end of the novel, with a twist that I didn’t see coming. As I’m the annoying person who guesses the murderer within 5 minutes of an episode of Inspector Morse beginning, this was quite a surprise…

Shepherd has written an atmospheric and thrilling novel, which invokes the spirit of Dickens, but in a very modern way. If I was going to complain about anything, it would be that the occasional comments from the omniscient narrator which looked back at the Victorian period from a modern view-point are annoying and unnecessary, pulling the reader out of the grim, smoky atmosphere just as they are getting used to it. Despite this irritation however, I found Tom-All-Alone’s a fascinating look at Dickensian London, as well as an intriguing murder mystery.

4/5

This book was provided as a review copy, but I was not paid for my review, and the views expressed are mine. 


The Murder Wall by Mari Hannah

Mari Hannah is a writer from the North-East whose first book, The Murder Wall, was released in paperback last week. She was signing copies signing copies in Newcastle, so I sent Mr. Mouse along to get me a copy. Set in Newcastle, Hannah’s début is a taut police procedural, centred around the complicated D.C.I. Kate Daniels and her team.

When Daniels visits her local church to light a candle for her recently deceased mother and discovers the victims of a double murder, she vows to catch the killer, no matter how long it takes. 11 months later and the investigation has ground to a halt, leaving Daniels feeling like a failure, whilst still haunted by what she saw in St. Camillus. When she is made the Senior Investigating Officer for a shooting on the Quayside, she jumps at the chance, hoping that she can make amends for the lack of closure in the previous case. However, the case doesn’t get off to the best start when she fails to disclose that she knows the victim, Alan Stephens, and it quickly gets more and more complicated for Daniels.

Much of the narrative focuses on Daniels, and thankfully she is a great character. She’s clever, brilliant at her job but also, crucially, she is far from perfect. Her private life is a mess, the Assistant Chief Commissioner hates her and, as a result of the St. Camillus murders, she is increasingly prone to ignoring protocol and working by herself. Her team is also peopled with properly fleshed-out characters, especially her favourite sergeant, Hank Gormley. Like his boss, his home life is falling apart due to the hours he gives to his job so he stays at work longer, in a vicious circle that has been seen many times in detectives before. Daniels’ immediate boss, Chief Superintendent Bright, is also a character who has been allowed a fair amount of ‘screen time’ throughout the novel. He is Daniels’ mentor and has always supported her decisions, but this case might be the one to tear them apart, as he resents her relationship with another member of the team.

Alternated with the narrative following Daniels and her team is another which focuses on the killer. The contrast between the two is well-drawn, and Hannah has a truly hideous creation in the vicious and sadistic villain. His motivations are slowly revealed as the story goes on, with information being drip-fed to the reader until the police work out who it is, when the pace suddenly accelerates towards the climax of the novel.

Hannah has a background in scriptwriting, and it shows. The chapters are short and snappy, keeping the story moving, and allowing the narrative to jump between characters without losing momentum. My only real criticism is that there are occasionally unnecessary repetitions of information; for example, I’m not convinced that we need to be told quite so many times that Bright is drinking too much, or that Daniels  has ruined her relationship with her lover. However, this is a tiny negative in an otherwise neat example of a police procedural.

3.5/5


More pretty books

(photo from Virago’s tweet)

Twitter is good for many things. Many people would say that one of their favourite things about it are the stupidly cute pictures of animals that people tweet, but I prefer the ridiculously pretty book pictures (ok, I love the sloths too). These beauties are the latest Virago Modern Classics Designer titles, designed by Neisha Crosland, and are just gorgeous. Following on from the publication of My Cousin Rachel that I featured last year, Virago have chosen three more Daphne du Maurier favourites: Rebecca, Jamaica Inn and Frenchman’s Creek. Obviously I’m excited about the lovely new Rebecca, but I think that Jamaica Inn might be the prettiest, which is handy as it’s one of my favourite Du Maurier novels.

The books will be out in May 2012, and will be £12.99.


WIN! A signed copy of “Weird Things Customers Say in Bookshops” up for grabs!

The lovely Jen Campbell (blogger, bookseller, poet and short story writer extraordinaire) popped into the shop on her way to the Edinburgh launch of Weird Things Customers Say in Bookshops this week, and I’ve decided to give one away to a lucky blog reader.

Jen started a collection of the funny and bizarre things that customers said following a tweet from John Cleese about pet peeves, and it’s grown into this gorgeously illustrated book.  Featuring such gems as “Do you have a copy of Mrs Dalloway, but, like, really old – so from, like, 1850?” and “Is this book edible?”, and would make an ace present, either for yourself or, if your less selfish than me, someone else!

To win, just leave a comment telling me what weird/funny/silly things you’ve said in shops – we’ve all got a couple! A winner will be picked at random on 30th April, and it’s open to international readers too. Only one entry each though, please.  Go!


Mice by Gordon Reece

Mice is the debut novel from Gordon Reece, an English writer who now lives in Australia. Narrated in the first person by a teenager, Shelley, it’s the story of what happens when two of life’s natural victims find their inner strength.

Shelley and her mother have moved to an isolated cottage in the English countryside to find some peace. Having survived a horrific  bullying campaign waged by her former best friends, which has left her with both mental and physical scars, Shelley needs some time and space to recover. Her mother also needs some peace. Shelley’s father left her for a younger woman but not before battering her fragile ego for years, annoyed at being shown up by his wife at the law firm for which they both worked. Both women are highly intelligent and eloquent but are also ‘mice’. Meek and timid, they shy away from confrontation. This changes when Shelley wakes up on the eve of her sixteenth birthday, convinced that she’s heard someone else in the house. What follows is violent and shocking, if not completely unsurprising. It is also hard to write about without giving the plot away. Suffice to say, Shelley and her mother are mice no more.

Reece’s writing style is straightforward, which actually contrasts sharply with some of the narrative. When Shelley is describing some of the things that her former friends did to her, her calm and simple manner really highlights the horrific nature of the bullying. The same can be said for events later in the novel, when Shelley and her mother try to come to terms with the way that that night unfolded. Shelley’s voice is sometimes too mature for a sixteen year old, but I suspect that Reece was trying to imply that her experiences at school, and with her parents’ divorce, had made her grow up quickly. Whatever the reason, she is a convincing character, as is her mother,whose legal knowledge has to be used for rather different ends than originally intended in the latter half of the novel.

As the novel goes on, things do get a little far-fetched, but the powerful writing never falters, and the last line of the book is chilling. I just wish that it had engaged me slightly more.

3.5/5


The Good Father – Noah Hawley

The first of Noah Hawley’s four novels to be published in the U.K., The Good Father has been dubbed ‘We need to talk about Daniel’ (James Kidd on www.theindependent.co.uk, 01/04/12), but is an easier read than Lionel Shriver’s modern classic.  This is not to say that it isn’t a powerful narrative, but rather that the writing is simpler and less challenging than in We Need to Talk About Kevin, which I personally found a bit of an unremittingly miserable slog of a novel.

Paul Allen is a renowned New York doctor, living a perfect life with his second wife and their twin sons in Connecticut. One evening, whilst eating homemade pizzas, Allen sees the breaking news about the shooting of the favourite Democrat presidential candidate, Jay Seagram. At the same moment, the doorbell rings and he opens his door to two men who have come to take him for questioning. As he is protesting, his wife, Fran, tells him that the news has a video of the shooting. The boy filmed with the gun is Daniel, Allen’s son from his troubled first marriage.

 After Danny’s arrest, Allen spends the next year searching for answers. He is convinced that they have got the wrong man, that his son, however wayward and aimless, cannot possibly be guilty of such an atrocious crime. Danny might have quit college and become a wanderer, but he is not a killer. He spends countless hours pouring over accounts of other assassinations  and shootings, sure that his son does not fit the profile of killers such as Lee Harvey Oswald and Eric Harris, one of the Columbine shooters. When he finally accepts that Danny might have actually pulled the trigger, he is once again convinced that it was not his fault. Obsessively mulling over other theories, Allen does everything to avoid looking at whether his divorce from Danny’s mother, Ellen, started a chain of reactions within his son that led him to shoot Seagram.
Told alternately from the point of view of both father and son, The Good Father looks at the lengths to which a father will go in order to understand his son’s actions, and at the unconditional love that a parent has for their child, even in the face of horrific possibilities. A page-turner, told with great honesty and humanity.
4/5
This book was provided for review by http://www.welovethisbook.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,233 other followers